Skip to main content

If Your Feminism Isn’t Intersectional, We Don’t Want It.



While feminism has been around in one way or another for decades, it has recently come to the forefront of social consciousness, especially since the rise of the #MeToo movement on social media in 2017. While it is great that feminism has gained traction in mainstream media and is forcing people to have a conversation about its importance, the popular brand of feminism that is white, middle class, cisgendered and able-bodied, aka white feminism, does more harm than good for the entire movement.


According to Encyclopaedia Britannica, feminism is “the belief in social, economic, and political equality of the sexes.” While it seems easy to boil it down to equality between men and women on paper, the reality is that it just isn’t that black and white. Women of colour, gay women, trans women and differently abled women all face drastically different hurdles and challenges in their fight for equality. Intersectionality seeks to include all women into the conversation, not just those who fit into the white female cookie cutter.


The idea that feminism has always been for all women is inaccurate. For example, women were given the right to vote in the USA in 1920, however, that privilege really only extended to white women. Native American women could not vote until 1924, Asian women till 1952 and black women until 1964. In fact, Susan B Anthony and Elizabeth Stanton, prominent figures of the suffrage movement, even demanded that women be allowed to vote before the blacks.


The inequality between the different races still exist today. While it’s well known that women in general earn less than men, women of colour in particular have it worse. In 2017, according to the US Bureau of Statistics, white women earned 81.9% when compared to the earnings of a white man. However, black women earned only 67.7% and Hispanic women 62.1% in comparison. Only Asian women earned more than white women.


Another group of women that are excluded from white feminism is transgender women. Some feminists are so threatened by them that they are critical of the notion that “trans women are women”. Called Trans Exclusionary Radical Feminists (TERFs), they believe that gender is a social class system that oppresses women due to biology rather than femininity. If this was true, violence against trans women would not exist, yet they face the highest risk - 4.3 times the risk of the general population of women, to be exact.


According to the Human Rights Campaign, since 2013 at least 128 transgender people were killed in the US - at least 110 were people of colour, and 9 out of 10 were trans women. For such a small subset of people, these numbers are staggering. Yet, white feminists don’t yell and shout and create hashtags on social media for these victims. Instead, they don their pink pussy hats (which in itself excludes trans and non-binary women as well as women of colour) and march the streets protesting for rights that benefit them while excluding everyone else.


White feminists need to understand that their narrow view of the world and limited experience in other forms of oppression such as racism, ableism, classism, homophobia and transphobia means that they cannot and do not speak for all women. Unless they stand up for all women, they should not use the guise of feminism to further their own agenda at the expense of others. If their feminism isn’t intersectional and doesn’t take into account the compounding nature of oppression, they can take it and shove it up their pink pussy hats.




https://www.telegraph.co.uk/women/womens-life/10572435/Intersectional-feminism.-What-the-hell-is-it-And-why-you-should-care.html


https://www.freep.com/story/news/2018/01/10/pink-pussyhats-feminists-hats-womens-march/1013630001/


https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2018/03/how-racism-nearly-derailed-womens-right-to-vote.html


https://qz.com/quartzy/1265902/why-im-giving-up-on-intersectional-feminism/


https://www.nytimes.com/2018/07/28/opinion/sunday/suffrage-movement-racism-black-women.html


https://www.hrc.org/blog/new-report-details-epidemic-of-violence-against-transgender-people


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Feminist_views_on_transgender_topics


https://iwpr.org/publications/gender-wage-gap-2017-race-ethnicity/


https://www.businessinsider.com/when-women-got-the-right-to-vote-american-voting-rights-timeline-2018-10


https://www.hrc.org/blog/gender-based-violence-lesbian-and-trans-women-face-the-highest-risk-but-get


Comments

  1. "...shove it up their pink pussy hats!!!" I love that. I agree that TWERFs and SWERFs are bad news for a feminism that really needs to address the inequality of women around the world. It denies us the personal choice and liberties of our bodies and, in a way, supports patriarchy by excluding groups of people that need to be protected from... well, patriarchy! I just want to take a moment to thank you for your emotional labour on this issue and that, as a white woman of privilege, I will do better.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Bike lanes in the city of Victoria

As the city of Victoria continues developing, much debate surrounds the idea of bike lanes in the city. According to the 2016 census, there are 85,792 people currently living in the city of Victoria, up from 80,017 in 2011. That is a population growth of 7.2% and brings the city’s population density to 4,405.8 people for every square kilometer. In comparison, Vancouver, Canada’s most populated city, has a population density of 5,493 people per square kilometre. As the city’s infrastructure slowly improves to catch up, there is a need to optimize travel in and around the city. The use of personal vehicles has been discouraged not only because it is harmful to the environment, but also because cars takes up a lot of space and causes congestion, as can be seen on the McKenzie interchange daily. Therefore, in tandem with improving transit options, the introduction of bike lanes gives residents another way to not just commute, but to commute safely and efficiently, while also helping ...

Tweeting Exercise

1. We are sorry to announce that we have been forced to restructure the company in light of major competition in the widget industry. Unfortunately, 200 NWC employees across Canada will be laid off at this time. All employees have been informed of the changes. 2. We have been working night and day in order to get our beloved company back on track, and we are happy to announce that we are now able to rehire all 200 employees that we were forced to lay off last year. 3. Exciting news! Since we signed a deal with China earlier this year, we have been looking into ways to expand the company. We are proud to announce that we will be opening a new manufacturing facility in Regina, Sask., and hiring 100 new employees.